Greenland Meadows LID Case Study: Economics and Water Quality

Monday, April 18, 2011

Greenland Meadows, New England Development, and the Conservation Law Foundation, Greenland, NH. (2005- Present)

OVERVIEW

Greenland Meadows is a retail shopping center built in 2008 by Newton, Mass.-based New England Development along Route 33 in Greenland, New Hampshire that features the largest porous asphalt and gravel wetland installation in the Northeast. The development is located on a 55.95-acre parcel and includes three, one-story retail buildings (Lowe’s Home Improvement, Target, and a supermarket), paved parking areas consisting of porous asphalt and non-porous pavements, landscaping areas, a large gravel wetland, as well as advanced stormwater management facilities. The total impervious area of the development – mainly from rooftops and non-porous parking areas – is approximately 25.6 acres, considerably more as compared to pre-development conditions. Prior to development, the project site contained an abandoned Sylvania light bulb factory with a majority of the property vegetated with grass and trees.

Framingham, Mass.-based Tetra Tech Rizzo provided site drainage engineering which included the design of two porous asphalt installations covering a total of 4.5 acres along with a sub-surface gravel wetland. The University of New Hampshire (UNH) Stormwater Center provided design guidance, LID project review, and oversight with the LID installations.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS

During the project permitting stage, concerns arose about potential adverse water quality impacts from the project. The development would increase the amount of impervious surface on the site resulting in a higher amount of stormwater runoff as compared to existing conditions. These concerns were especially heightened given the fact that the development is located immediately adjacent to Pickering Brook, an impaired waterway that connects to the Great Bay. One group that was particularly interested in the project’s approach to managing stormwater was the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF), an environmental advocacy organization.

LID SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY

The two porous asphalt drainage systems – one in the main parking lot and one in the eastern parking area – serve to attenuate peak flows, while the aggregate reservoirs, installed directly below the two porous asphalt placements, serve as storage for the underlying sand filter. Runoff from the sand filter, which itself provides extended detention and filtration, flows through perforated underdrain pipes that converge to a large gravel wetland on the west side of the site. The gravel wetland is designed as a series of flow-through treatment cells providing an anaerobic system of crushed stone with wetland soils and plants. This innovative LID design works to remove pollutants as well as mitigate the thermal impacts of stormwater.

 

ECONOMIC COMPARISONS

Two site work and stormwater management design options were prepared for the Greenland Meadows development:

  • · Conventional – this option included standard asphalt and concrete pavement along with a traditional sub-surface stormwater detention system consisting of a gravel sub-base and stone backfill, in addition to detention ponds and 6-inch up to 48-inch diameter piping with supporting infrastructure
  • · LID – this option included the use of porous asphalt and standard paving in addition to a porous asphalt sub-surface stone reservoir, a gravel wetland, as well as 4-inch up to 36-inch diameter piping with supporting infrastructure

Paving costs were estimated to be considerably more expensive (by $884,000) for the LID option because of the inclusion of the porous asphalt, and stone reservoir layer. However, the LID option was also estimated to save $71,000 in earthwork costs as well as $1,743,000 in total stormwater management costs. Overall, comparing the total site work and stormwater management cost estimates for each option, the LID alternative was calculated to save the developers a total of $930,000.

WATER QUALITY MONITORING

A four-phase wet weather flow monitoring program involving the use of automated samplers was implemented at the Greenland Meadows site in order to assess background conditions for Pickering Brook, evaluate stormwater quality runoff from the project site, and determine the resultant water quality of Pickering Brook downstream from Greenland Meadows. This effort is also being done to assess treatment system performance with respect to effluent concentrations (pre- and post-construction) and upstream receiving water conditions.

The first three phases were completed between July of 2007 and October 2010 and included pre-construction monitoring (phase one), construction activity monitoring (phase two), and one year of post-construction monitoring (phase three). The fourth phase is currently underway and will include four years of monitoring to determine the long-term performance of the system. Runoff constituent analyses routinely include total suspended solids (TSS), total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel (TPH-D), total nitrogen (NO3, NO2, NH4, TKN), and total metals (Zn). Additional analytes such as total phosphorus and ortho-phosphate have been added due to their relative importance in stormwater effluent characteristics.

WATER QUALITY PERFORMANCE

To date, the median TSS, TN, and TP concentrations for the post-construction treated runoff are below pre-construction monitoring concentrations and significantly below concentrations found in the receiving waters of Pickering Brook. Those are results are depicted below:

 

Parameter

Post-Construction

Pre-Construction

Pickering Brook

TSS

3 mg/L

5 mg/L

53 mg/L

TN

0.50 mg/L

0.55 mg/L

1.35 mg/L

TP

0.005 mg/L

0.05 mg/L

0.145 mg/L

Monitoring results indicate that the stormwater management systems are operating well and are providing a high level of treatment for runoff originating from a high contaminant load commercial site, offering significant protection to the impaired receiving waters of Pickering Brook. Water quality results show that effluent pollutant levels leaving the site at the gravel wetland are typically at or below ambient stream concentrations across a wide range of contaminants. In addition, baseflow benefits, while not yet quantified, are observed discharging in a manner similar to shallow groundwater discharge, providing a nearly continuous source of cool clean baseflow from the site.

 

CASE STUDIES AND WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

Greenland Meadows LID Case Study: Water Quality

Greenland Meadows LID Case Study: Economics

Download and view the 2010 Water Quality Report